Description of Chamaeleo incognitus has been declared invalid

Description of Chamaeleo incognitus has been declared invalid

Neubeschreibungen Science

The Chamaeleo dilepis complex continues to raise a great many questions. A comprehensive study of its genetics and morphology across large parts of Africa has yet to be carried out. In 2025, Nečas described the species Chamaeleo incognitus in the journal Archaius, which he himself edited, managed and published. He also elevated the subspecies Chamaeleo dilepis roperi and Chamaeleo dilepis martensi to species status. South African researchers have now examined the issue in greater detail and concluded that both the new description and the changes to the species’ status are invalid.

The authors of the current paper highlight several issues underlying this species description. Firstly, Nečas assumes that a preserved chameleon from Mombasa (Kenya) is the ‘true’ Chamaeleo dilepis. However, the type locality of Chamaeleo dilepis is Gabon, some 3,300 km away from the East African Chamaeleo dilepis. Furthermore, there exists no detailed description of the hemipenes from the holotype – that is, the specimen first described under the name Chamaeleo dilepis. Only a publication from 2007 mentions the hemipenes of Chamaeleo dilepis briefly, in nine words. Nevertheless, Nečas uses these few words as an established description and states that the hemipenes of Chamaeleo incognitus differed from them. What he then describes very briefly, corresponds to the hemipenes of Chamaeleo dilepis roperi. In the photographs of the hemipenes of Chamaeleo incognitus, however – just to add to the confusion – the South African scientists recognise the same characteristics as those found on the hemipenes of Chamaeleo dilepis from Mombasa.

Furthermore, a 2022 study using phylogenetic analysis stated that the Chamaeleo dilepis of East Africa differ significantly from those of West Africa. Both the lowland and highland species of East Africa form a single clade. Purely in terms of appearance, it is not possible to reliably distinguish between the Chamaeleo dilepis roperi from the coastal region and those from the highlands. If one were to describe one of the two populations as a separate species – in this case, the one in the highlands as Chamaeleo incognitus – genetic evidence would be required. This is lacking in Nečas’s publication. The only remaining difference between the species is the different habitat or altitude – which is not sufficient for the South African scientists to describe a separate species. Chamaeleo incognitus should therefore be regarded as a synonym of Chamaeleo dilepis roperi.

Furthermore, the description did not comply with the rules of the ICZN (International Code of Zoological Nomenclature). Common ‘best practice’ guidelines, such as disclosing a conflict of interest, were not followed. This includes, for example, publishing an article in one’s own journal without expert review (known as peer review).

Chamaeleo incognitus or Chamaeleo ignotus? Questioning the taxonomic validity of a new chameleon species
Devon C. Main, Colin R. Tilbury
African Journal of Herpetology, April 2026
DOI: 0.1080/21564574.2025.2595158
Free article download

Picture: Chamaeleo dilepis from Botswana

Rhampholeon spectrum – not just one species?

Rhampholeon spectrum – not just one species?

Science

The pygmy chameleon genus Rhampholeon is mainly found in East Africa. Rhampholeon viridis, Rhampholeon spinosus, and Rhampholeon temporalis each live in clearly defined and isolated areas of Tanzania. Rhampholeon spectrum, however, seems to be the complete opposite so far: The species has an enormous range in western Africa. It extends from Côte d’Ivoire through Ghana, Togo, and Benin to Nigeria and the outskirts of Niger and Chad, then on through Cameroon, Equatorial Guinea, and Gabon into the Central African Republic as well as the Democratic Republic of Congo and the Republic of Congo. Researchers from the USA and Cameroon have now investigated genetically what is behind the wide distribution.

Samples from an island at the northernmost tip of Equatorial Guinea, several mountains in Cameroon, and samples from two areas in Gabon were examined. To the researchers’ astonishment, it turned out that Rhampoleon spectrum is by no means genetically identical everywhere. Two clades could be identified from the samples: One in the lowlands and one in the montane forest, where the chameleons are found exclusively above 700 m a.s.l. A total of five genetically distinct populations were identified, several of which may represent new, as yet undescribed chameleon species.

The lowland clade includes the population in Gabon, where chameleons were sampled from Ivindo National Park and animals in an area near the town of Mekambo. The second population of the lowland clade occurs at low altitudes on Mount Korup, a mountain of volcanic origin. Mount Korup is located in the protected national park of the same name in Cameroon on the border with Nigeria.

The montane clade of the Rhampholeon spectrum includes three populations. One population occurs on Mount Biao on the island of Bioko, which belongs to Equatorial Guinea. A second population is found on Mount Cameroon, an active volcano in western Cameroon not far from the Gulf of Guinea. The type specimen of Rhampholeon spectrum comes from Mount Cameroon. The locality mentioned in the first description, Mapanja, is only a few kilometres away from one of the places where individuals were collected in the present study. This population is therefore probably the “true” Rhampholeon spectrum, the so-called topotypic group. The third population of the montane clade is found on three neighbouring mountains in Cameroon: Mount Kupe, Mount Mangengouba, and Mount Nlonako. Together with Mount Cameroon and Mount Biao, all three belong to the so-called Cameroon Line, a mountain range of volcanic origin that stretches along the border between Cameroon and Nigeria from the sea to Lake Chad.

The researchers are also looking into the question of how the different populations might have evolved. The separation between Rhampoleon spectrum and the pygmy chameleons in Tanzania can be dated to the late Eocene around 40 million years ago. During this time, the previously continuous rainforests in West, Central, and East Africa broke up into smaller, sometimes isolated fragments. The Rhampoleon spectrum clade then split into lowland and montane populations in the Miocene around 11.1 million years ago. In the Miocene, tectonic movements led to the uplift of a low mountain range that extended from southern Cameroon to the south of the Republic of Congo. Rivers, deserts, and other geographical barriers changed. Somewhat later, about 9.3 million years ago, the population on Bioko Island split off. The island’s pygmy chameleons are thus older than the island itself – the researchers explain this phenomenon by the fact that the island must have been connected to mainland Africa via a land bridge in the past. The chameleons would therefore have colonised the island, found a home on the mountain, and only then became isolated from the mainland. However, the genetically identical population on the mainland could not be found – researchers consider it extinct. In the late Miocene, around 6.9 million years ago, the populations on Mount Korup and in Gabon emerged. Only at the transition from the Miocene to the Pleistocene, 5.2 million years ago, did the populations on Mount Cameroon and Mount Kupe emerge.

Further research on this topic will show whether new species are actually hiding under the name Rhampholeon spectrum – chances are good. It would also be interesting to investigate populations of the species that are not mentioned in this study. Because, of course, the Rhampholeon spectrum from southern and eastern Cameroon, continental Equatorial Guinea, southern Gabon, and the Congo could also be further, independent populations. Science remains exciting!

Diversification and historical demography of Rhampholeon spectrum in West-Central Africa
Walter Paulin, Tapondjou Nkonmeneck, Kaitlin E. Allen, Paul M. Hime, Kristen N. Knipp, Marina M. Kameni, Arnaud M. Tchassem, LeGrand N. Gonwouo, Rafe M. Brown
PLOS One, December 2022
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277107